🔗 Share this article

Through a unattributed ruling, the highest judicial body has allowed Texas to use a redrawn congressional district plan that may create several five new GOP-friendly districts. The 6-3 order, issued on Thursday, approves a appeal by the state to overturn a federal judge's block that had rejected the boundaries in November.

Justices' Rationale

The lower court erroneously placed itself into an active primary campaign, generating considerable confusion and disturbing the fine balance of power in elections, the order stated in justifying its action.

That lower court had earlier ruled that Texas had probably classified voters based on their race – a practice known as unconstitutional racial sorting – when it enacted the boundaries. It had mandated the state to revert to the maps drawn after the last decennial survey for the next year's election.

Sharp Dissent

With a forcefully written dissent, Justice Elena Kagan took issue with the court's ruling. She stated that it undermined the work of the district court, noting that its ruling was crafted by a judge appointed by ex-President Donald Trump.

We are a higher court than the district court, but we are not a better one when it comes to making such a fact-based decision, Kagan wrote in a dissent co-signed by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

The justice went on, This court's stay solidifies that Texas's redistricting plan, with all its enhanced partisan advantage, will dictate next year's elections. And it means that many Texas citizens, unjustly, will be grouped in electoral districts due to their race. And that result, as this court has declared consistently, is a violation of the constitution.

National Map-Drawing Fight

The court's action comes amid a nationwide battle over the remapping of electoral maps. Texas is an essential part in pushes to alter the U.S. House map to protect a fragile Republican control. Typically, boundary revision occurs after a new decade's census. Yet the decision by Texas Republicans to initiate a bold off-cycle redistricting earlier this year sparked a series of events among other states.

Conservative legislators in states like North Carolina and Missouri have also enacted new maps that could add a number of additional conservative seats. Democratic lawmakers, meanwhile, have pushed back with their own plans in states like California and Virginia, which are intended to balance those potential gains.

Partisan Responses

Lone Star State attorney general welcomed the supreme court ruling. In a comment, he said the order upheld Texas's basic authority to draw a map that secures electoral outcomes supportive of Republicans. We are setting the precedent for restoring our country, through each electoral district and individual state, he remarked.

Conversely, opposition party leaders decried the decision. It's incredibly disappointing that the Court has rubber stamped a map enacted by Texas Republicans which, simply put, is an extreme, racially gerrymandered map, said the leader of a major party election organization.

A leading House leader stated the court had yet again shredded its legitimacy by upholding a race-based map. This decision from the Court's far-right bloc proves extremists are willing to rig elections. The Texas map is a discriminatory power grab targeting Black and Latino voters, he added.