🔗 Share this article

British American Tobacco has been accused of “total contradiction” for lobbying against tobacco control measures in Africa that currently exist in the UK.

Zambian lobbying efforts

Correspondence acquired by reporters dispatched by the company’s subsidiary in Zambia to the African officials asks for measures restricting tobacco marketing and promotional activities to be scrapped or postponed.

The company is attempting modifications of a proposed legislation that include reductions in the suggested dimensions of graphic health warnings on cigarette packaging, the withdrawal of controls on flavored smoking items, and diminished punishments for any businesses disregarding the new laws.

Health advocate reaction

“Were I in government, I would say that they enable the defense of the British people and continue the mortality of the Zambian people,” commented Master Chimbala.

Over seven thousand citizens a year die from smoking-associated diseases, according to global health agency statistics.

The advocate mentioned the letter was understood to have been copied to several government departments and was in circulation among civil society groups.

International corporate influence worries

It comes amid expanded apprehension about business sector influence with medical guidelines. In recent weeks, WHO officials issued a warning that the smoking product companies was intensifying efforts to weaken global control measures.

“There is proof of business advocacy worldwide. Manufacturer hallmarks are on postponed duty hikes in Indonesia, stalled legislation in Zambia and even a weakened declaration at the UN international gathering,” stated the tobacco industry watchdog.

Likely impacts

“If a tobacco control measure doesn't get enacted because of this letter, the price could be paid in lives of people who might otherwise quit smoking.”

The public health measure being considered by Zambia’s parliament includes measures that exceed UK legislation by extending coverage to e-cigarettes, and stipulating that graphic health warnings cover three-quarters of product packaging.

Corporate counter-proposals

Through correspondence, the corporation proposes this be reduced to 30% or 50% “according to global suggested parameters”, postponed for minimum twelve months after the legislation is approved.

Global health authorities specifically advises a alert needs to encompass at least fifty percent of the front of a pack “and seek to occupy as much of the main visible surfaces as possible”. Within Britain, warnings are required to occupy sixty-five percent of a cigarette pack surfaces.

Flavor restrictions debate

BAT asks for the withdrawal of extensive controls on flavored cigarette varieties, claiming that it would push consumers toward “illicitly sold” products. It suggests prohibiting a smaller list of “scents derived from desserts, candy, energy drinks, soft drinks and alcohol drinks”. Every scented tobacco product have been prohibited in Britain since 2020.

The pending regulation suggests penalties for different infractions “ranging from a fraction of annual sales to a decade in prison”.

Company justification

In the letter, the company executive of the African subsidiary claims the corporation is focused on ethical business practices” and “endorses the aims of governments to lower tobacco use and the connected wellbeing effects” but maintains that “specific rules can have negative and unanticipated results.”

Activist reaction

The advocate stated BAT’s proposed changes would “weaken this legislation so much that the necessary effect for it to produce permanent improvement in society will not be achieved”.

The circumstance that numerous similar measures existed in the UK, where BAT is headquartered, was “total double standard”, he said.

“We exist in a connected world. If I plant tobacco in my back yard and collect the yield and market the products – and my family members avoid tobacco, but my neighbour’s children do … to benefit personally and all the subsequent offspring while my neighbour’s children are dying … is in itself total emotional bankruptcy.”

Public health laws in the United Kingdom or other countries had not caused companies to close, the campaigner stated. “Laws don't eliminate the industry. Measures simply defend the people.”

Standard business position

A BAT Zambia spokesperson stated: “BAT Zambia conducts its operations according with current country statutes. Further, the company participates in the state's regulatory development in line with the relevant frameworks which provide for interested party involvement in regulation development.”

The corporation remained “not opposed to regulation”, the representative commented, noting that underage people should be protected from acquiring smoking products and nicotine.

“We advocate for progressive regulation to accomplish desired population health targets, while accepting the variety of entitlements and duties on businesses, users and involved parties,” the spokesperson stated, adding that the corporation's recommendations “mirror the circumstances of the Zambian market and smoking product business, which involves increasing amounts of black market activity”.

The country's office of business, commercial affairs and industrial development was solicited for statement.