🔗 Share this article

Out-of-pocket costs. In-network. Out-of-network. Premium health services. Personal healthcare costs. Fixed payment. Shared insurance. Insurance consultants. Coverage agents. Medical advisors. Affordable Care Act. HMO. Preferred Provider Organization. EPO. Point of Service. High Deductible Health Plan. Health Savings Account. FSA. Health Reimbursement Arrangement. EOB. Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act. SHOP. Single coverage. Family coverage. Insurance subsidies.

Confused? It's understandable. Who comprehends all this stuff? Not the typical business owner. Nor the typical worker. Selecting the right medical coverage for companies – or for our families – appears to require demands a PhD in medical insurance.

The Medical System Isn't Just Complex, It's Expensive

Based on a recent study, the average family spends $27,000 each year for their health insurance (increasing by 6% compared to last year). The average company healthcare expense is expected to exceed $17,000 for each worker by 2026, a 9.5% jump compared to 2025.

Currently federal operations is shut down due to partisan disputes regarding tax credits that experts say could cause premium increases up to 100% for numerous US citizens.

When Will We Truly Examine Universal Healthcare?

How soon might we genuinely evaluate a national health insurance program in the United States? I'm convinced we're approaching that point since this can't continue.

I'm not proposing government-run medicine. I'm proposing for our current Medicare system – an insurance system – simply expand to include all citizens. The existing system remains intact. How our healthcare providers get paid changes. Believe me, they'll adapt.

How National Health Insurance Would Work

A national health insurance program would require payments from both employees and employers. In similar programs, an employee making average wages must contribute approximately 5.3% toward medical coverage. The company must contribute approximately 13.75%.

Does this seem like a lot? Not if you compare it to what average US resident spends. I can name multiple clients who are routinely paying between eight to fifteen percent of their employee wages to their healthcare costs. And keep in mind that with comprehensive systems, those payments also cover retirement benefits, illness coverage, parental benefits and job loss protection in addition to supporting medical services. When you add those costs compared with our current spending for our retirement plans, job loss coverage and paid time off, the gap narrows.

Implementation in the US

In the US, a national health premium would raise existing Medicare taxes, a system already established. It ought to be means-based – wealthier individuals would pay more than lower-income earners. This includes both worker and company payments. And, like many federal military, IT, welfare services and transportation services, the system could be managed by private contractors instead of federal agencies.

Advantages for Entrepreneurs

Universal healthcare coverage represents a significant advantage for small businesses such as my company. It would place small companies in equal competition with our larger competitors that can pay for better plans. It would render administration much easier (a payroll deduction processed similarly to social security and healthcare taxes, instead of separate payments to benefit firms and insurance providers).

It would enable simpler for us to budget annual expenditures, rather than going through the complex (and ineffective) process of bargaining with major insurers required annually every year. Because it's simplified, there would exist a better understanding about benefits by our employees – as opposed to existing arrangements where they have to interpret the complexities of current options. Additionally there would certainly be less liability for companies since we wouldn't would be privy to workers' health histories for risk assessment and alternative plans.

Free-Market Viewpoint

I'm as capitalist as possible. However I recognize that public institutions has a significant role in our lives, including national security to funding needed infrastructure. Ensuring medical coverage to all via universal healthcare enhances our economy's infrastructure. It's a better, easier system for small businesses which hire more than half of the country's workers and generate half the economic output. It makes it possible employees to be healthier, have better attendance and be more productive.

Addressing Concerns

Exist a million considerations I haven't covered? Of course there are. But with rising medical expenses experienced in recent years, it's evident that current healthcare legislation isn't functioning very well. And I realize that we're not a compact European nation where big changes can be readily adopted. However extending universal Medicare, even with increased taxation required, would still be a superior and less expensive approach both for managing medical expenses and ensuring coverage to everyone.

Time for Honest Assessment

We as Americans, we need to reduce our own arrogance. America's medical care isn't exceptional. We rank well below numerous nations with the best healthcare in the world, based on major studies. Perhaps a bright spot in this present circumstances could be that we undertake a hard look in the mirror and acknowledge that major reforms need to happen.